The most useful numbers in a match summary are expected goals (xG), shots from inside the penalty area and shots on target. The most talked-about number, and the one that tells you least on its own, is possession: keeping the ball is not the same as doing something dangerous with it.
A match screen throws dozens of figures at you, and they are not all worth the same. Roughly, this is the order our analysts read them in:
| Statistic | What it shows | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | Quality of the chances created | High |
| Shots inside the box | How many attacks turned genuinely dangerous | High |
| Shots on target | Attempts that reached the goal | Medium-high |
| Total shots | Quantity of attempts, not their quality | Medium |
| Corners | A sign of pressure, not a sign of goals | Low-medium |
| Possession | Playing style; cannot be read in isolation | Low |
Those weightings are not measured coefficients; they are the order our team reads the data in.
Possession measures who had the ball, not where it was. A side passing between its own centre-backs and a side working the ball around the opposition box can post the same percentage. The number does not tell them apart.
The second reason is the scoreline. A team that goes ahead usually drops deeper and gives the ball away on purpose, so low possession is sometimes the result of being on top, not a sign of being outplayed. Closing out a 1-0 win with, say, 38 per cent of the ball proves nothing on its own.
It becomes useful in two cases: when a side moves clearly away from its own norm, and when you read it alongside shots and touches in the box. A team that normally sees 60 per cent of the ball dropping to 35 tells you something; the bare percentage does not.
Total shots measure quantity: a hopeful swing from 30 metres and a tap-in from six metres land in the same column. Shots on target is narrower and more honest: it counts only attempts that reached the goal. It is still incomplete, though: a tame effort at the goalkeeper counts, while a fierce strike off the crossbar does not.
Expected goals rates every shot on its own merits, by where it was struck from and what kind of chance it was: how often have shots like this ended up in the net? A drive from distance and a header from six metres stop being equals. Our separate guide on expected goals covers this in detail.
Most statistical talk stops at the attacking column. Yet how a side defends is the steadier half of its profile, and it needs different numbers:
Attacking numbers describe what a team did; defensive numbers describe what it allowed. One without the other is half a picture.
Say Team A has 65 per cent of the ball and 14 shots, but only 3 on target and 0.9 expected goals. Team B has 35 per cent, 8 shots, 5 on target and 1.7 expected goals. (Hypothetical figures, for illustration only.) Most will say Team A dominated; in fact Team B created the danger. Even if it finishes 1-1, B's data tells you more about the weeks ahead.
The same habit applies everywhere: in goal markets such as over/under 2.5, in both teams to score, in corner analysis. You do not read the number; you read the football behind it. A statistic explains what has already happened; it never promises what comes next.
You can find this kind of reading, applied to each day's fixtures, in the WinBall app.
This page is for information only. WinBall is not a betting platform; it only provides match analysis and predictions. 18+
Stay one step ahead with professional football analyses and data-driven predictions.
Payments are handled securely in-app via the App Store and Google Play.
18+ · Our predictions are for information and analysis purposes only; they do not guarantee any outcome. This platform does not offer betting and does not direct users to any betting site. Illegal betting is a crime. Please act responsibly.
© 2026 CH Global Bilişim Teknolojileri Limited Şirketi. All rights reserved.